İlk Ateş Eden Mı Kazanır Hukuk Savaşını?

In a legal battle, does the one who fires the first shot win? Is it like a naval battle, where the ship that catches the other by surprise has an advantage? Scoring hits at close range could knock out the enemy ship's guns. It could start fires. That might give a smaller ship an advantage in the form of surprise. But legal battles are not naval battles. There are other factors that enter the mix.

In a legal battle, the side that strikes first shows they are serious about their dispute. That much is true. It could sometimes show they are right... or at least that they BELIEVE they are right. Hitting first could sometimes strike fear in an opponent. Being sued is stressful for the person on the receiving end. Some people think that hitting first could result in quick settlement. Those people might see the legal process like that old toy where kids controlled plastic boxers and tried to deliver a knockout punch for a quick victory. https://youtu.be/C9Y9IBnAcls But lawsuits aren't that simple, where a "knockout punch" ends things quickly. Speaking of boxers, an older article had covered legal analysis of the airline incident involving Mike Tyson - https://www.communityabroad.com/turkish/post/1000000050056#

The person bringing the lawsuit needs to show that they were truly wronged. They must show they deserve compensation. If the person bringing the lawsuit can't show a good reason for the lawsuit, they risk being accused of bringing a frivolous lawsuit. That means the lawsuit is "eften püften," or flimsy. It is a weak lawsuit meant to harass. And there could be legal penalties for that.

Here's something else to think about. Not everyone on the receiving end of a lawsuit gets terrified. A multi-billion-dollar insurance company isn't going to roll over and cry when it is sued. It doesn't matter who "threw the first punch." It's going to be a long and drawn out fight in court. And that's when someone might say, "davam yavaş gidiyor." https://www.communityabroad.com/turkish/post/1000000049161

Also, throwing the first punch doesn't protect one from legal fees if they are in the wrong. Some jurisdictions make the aggressor pay legal fees if the lawsuit was nonsense. So, it isn't only about throwing the first punch. It's about proving that the law is on your side. It's about showing that the lawsuit is reasonable. It's about showing that you suffered genuine damages. It's about making a credible case to a jury.

Yes, it's true that striking first could sometimes have strong impact. Like the powerful naval gun pictured here, taking the first shot could show that one means business. It could be an impressive show of force, like the muzzle flashes and shell splashes of a 16" gun - https://youtu.be/vhto0ud4MgA But lawsuits don't always end quickly by taking a few "first shots." Instead, big and important lawsuits can go on for a long time, like this ship slowly and painfully making her way through rough seas https://youtu.be/TYe2tkXgPqs

I hope that none of you will ever need to go through the lawsuit process. But if you do, good luck.

Good Luck - Kendinize İyi Bakın

Yolunuz Açık Olsun

Avukat Timur Akpinar

(718) 224-9824

www.benimavukatim.com

https://www.instagram.com/timtim111111111/

Public Domain Image